WCJP - Management Courts

Part of our Alternatives to Prison series by the Wellington Community Justice Project.

 

Management Courts

by Juliet Bull

Within the criminal justice sector, the United States is more often associated with incarceration than innovation. Nevertheless, New Zealand should follow America’s lead with the establishment of management courts.

Management courts are a special type of court which emphasise the rehabilitation and reintegration of offenders. The late prominent defence lawyer Greg King has advocated for the adoption of such courts in New Zealand, after seeing their operation in the United States. They are similar in principle to the drug courts recently established on a five-year pilot in New Zealand, in which offenders will be offered extensive rehabilitation and support alongside ongoing alcohol and drug testing. These courts are an important development considering that 80 per cent of offending in New Zealand occurs under the influence of drugs and alcohol, or to feed an addiction. However, this pilot does not go far enough and should increase in scope. King envisaged a holistic court which addresses the whole litany of problems associated with typical offenders, where alcohol and drug addiction can be addressed alongside mental health issues and a lack of education and skills training.

The Courts would have wide authority to develop a personalised programme to suit offenders’ needs, operating both at sentencing and upon release from prison. At sentencing, the Court would impose conditions conducive to rehabilitation, like attending drug treatment, while also imposing punitive conditions like community work alongside measures designed for public safety like curfews. Where operating upon release from prison, the offender would already have been punished through their imprisonment so the Court’s focus would be primarily to rehabilitate and reintegrate the offender.

The current system is desperately in need of reform. New Zealand judges are poorly equipped to oversee compliance with the sentence they impose - after sentencing, judges are typically disassociated from the case. Another problem is the limited range of conditions that courts can impose when sentencing an offender. Defendants are often subject to far fewer restrictions with their actual sentence than they were whilst on bail.

Management Courts address these issues by giving judges broader discretion to impose a sentence suitable to the particular offender, and by encouraging the provision of on-going support through a core team of individuals including the judge, case manager and treatment provider. Judges should talk directly with eligible offenders in a supportive way, to congratulate their progress and ensure they are staying on track. Sceptical? So was Greg King, until he saw in person the dramatic effect that such praise had on offenders.

New Zealand cannot afford to dismiss these innovations as ‘soft on crime’ and continue down the fiscally unsustainable path we are on. Simply imposing longer sentences does not change offending patterns once offenders are released from prison - which they eventually will be. We cannot keep throwing money at the same failed policies while hoping that something will change. Instead we must reduce our high rate of recidivism by adopting policies geared towards rigorous rehabilitation and supervision, policies which are proven to promote change within offenders.

 

1 Comment

Comment posted on behalf of

Comment posted on behalf of Susan Miller:

The Management Courts model is undoubtedly the best way forward for the unsustainably high NZ incarceration rate, particularly as 80% of offending is  proven to be substance related. A few years ago I too became aware of the success of such a change of modus operandi, where the humanitarian interaction between judge and offender, during the rehabilitation process, is cause for optimism. 

In addition, I am given to understand that there is a high correlation between offending and dyslexia, due to the alienation of children, particularly boys, who have the syndrome. The inability to excel in schoolwork leads to frustration and anger, then anti-social behaviour. The figures I have heard, of approximately 80% of the prison population being dyslexic, will clearly also respond to the particular programme mentioned in Juliet Bull's excellent piece, where the lack of education and skills training are addressed in the management courts model, with predictably positive results, as observed by the late and great Greg King. 

 

Add new comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.